07/06/2013 - Fish Legal
The expert
environmental and angling lawyers at Fish Legal, who act on behalf of over
1,000 angling clubs throughout the UK, have highlighted the low level of fines
paid by offenders in the UK for polluting watercourses. Fish Legal has
this week written to the Sentencing Council welcoming its proposals for tougher
pollution penalties, particularly for large companies, but urging it to go much
further.
The solicitors' robust
response to the Sentencing Council's consultation on its environmental
offences guidelines coincided with news from the USA of a paper company being
fined a total of $3.3 million for polluting the Pearl River in Louisiana,
killing 160,000 fish. This is many times greater than the amount that
would be currently possible in the UK.
Even under the
Sentencing Council's beefed-up proposals, the absolute maximum fine for the
same offence in the UK would be £2 million, provided there were not any
mitigating factors such as an early guilty plea to reduce it. Fish Legal
has direct experience of many pollution-related criminal prosecutions through
its work taking civil claims on behalf of its member angling clubs, fisheries
and riparian owners. Its lawyers have repeatedly seen multi-national
companies fined a few thousand pounds for offences which cause significant and
long-term damage to the water environment and to fisheries.
Fish Legal points
out in its response that if we are effectively to deter, punish and remove financial
gain from offenders then the range of fines must go much higher for big
business polluters. Water and sewage companies are some of the worst repeat
offenders and this is because it 'pays to pollute'. It would seem that some of
them would rather pay a fine than spend many millions more on upgrading their
infrastructure - this commercial saving is financial gain that needs to be
removed so they are incentivised to respect the environment and stop polluting.
Fish Legal, which
acts as the legal arm of the Angling Trust in England, has called for the
Council to:
- increase
the levels of maximum and minimum fines still further
- include
absolute minimum levels under which fines shall not go no matter what
- remove
upper limits for the most serious offences to enable sentencers to
sanction the worst offenders appropriately and remove financial gain
- ensure
that companies are properly assessed for their ability to pay so that the
bigger the company, the higher the fine
- to
extend the review of offences to the Salmon and Freshwater Fisheries Act
1975, which was not included, so prosecutors focus on the injury caused to
fish and not just technical breaches of permits
- to
take into account the cumulative impact of multiple apparently minor
pollution incidents that still seriously affect biodiversity and lead to
the 'death of rivers by a thousand cuts'
- ensure
that it is not cheaper to pollute and pay the fine than to invest in
pollution prevention measures and remain within the law
- to
take into account the previous record of a company, including offences
which were not prosecuted (e.g. repeat warnings or other enforcement
measures)
- to
consider the impact of water pollution on the amenity value for angling
- to
ensure that angling clubs and those who own or lease fishing rights are
consulted about any measures to pay compensation or take remedial action
- to
hear evidence from angling interests and others directly affected by
pollution when determining the level of fines.
Mark
Lloyd, chief executive of the Angling Trust and Fish Legal said: "We welcome the
Sentencing Council's proposals but urge them to go further to provide a really
powerful deterrent to those who spill toxic waste into the water
environment. We urge them to stand firm against the inevitable pressure
from companies who will call for fines to be maintained at their current
pathetically-low level. Anglers are fed up with seeing corporate fat cats
walking away from the courts with little more than a slap on the wrist for
polluting rivers, lakes and coastlines. The health of these waters is
vital for the well-being of everyone in the country, and particularly for
several million anglers and the angling industry which employs 37,000
people."
William
Rundle, Head Solicitor at Fish Legal, said: "Pollution is
endemic throughout the UK with farmers and water companies causing some of the
worst damage to water bodies in the country. We believe this is because low
fines provide little deterrent, and paying them can be less expensive than
taking the appropriate measures to avoid offending in the first place.
Pollution affects us all, it causes untold damage to the environment, creates
public health risks, and damages the private interests of others. It is -
frankly - scandalous that the justice system imposes such small fines and
sentencing needs to get much tougher if this situation is going to
improve. To a large extent it depends on the Environment Agency doing
better investigations and putting accurate information before the courts that
shows the full impact of pollution on the environment and those directly
affected, such as anglers."
Notes to
Editors:
Fish Legal's Consultation Response can be downloaded HERE.
Fish
Legal:
Fish Legal is a membership association set up originally in 1948 and which
operates throughout the UK. Previously we were known as the Anglers
Conservation Association (or ACA). Its members come together with the common
objectives of promoting and encouraging the conservation of our rivers, lakes
and fisheries, and using the law to protect them and the interests of our
members to fish in them.
In England Fish
Legal acts as the legal arm of the Angling Trust, the representative body for
angling.
Back to the News List